On Aug 11, 2005, at 23:17:07, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 12:59 +1000, roucaries bastien wrote:
They post on this list 1 year and a half ago no answer.
I guess everyone on LKML has day jobs now, no one has time for fun
stuff
like reverse engineering drivers anymore... :-(
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 12:59 +1000, roucaries bastien wrote:
> They post on this list 1 year and a half ago no answer.
>
I guess everyone on LKML has day jobs now, no one has time for fun stuff
like reverse engineering drivers anymore... :-(
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 8/12/05, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 09:52 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> > they are much less likely to participate in any kind of reverse
> > engineering effort, even if it's just testing a new driver.
>
> I think anyone launching a reverse engineering effort
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 09:52 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> they are much less likely to participate in any kind of reverse
> engineering effort, even if it's just testing a new driver.
I think anyone launching a reverse engineering effort should announce
the project to LKML! When I set out to
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 09:52 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
they are much less likely to participate in any kind of reverse
engineering effort, even if it's just testing a new driver.
I think anyone launching a reverse engineering effort should announce
the project to LKML! When I set out to add
On 8/12/05, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 09:52 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
they are much less likely to participate in any kind of reverse
engineering effort, even if it's just testing a new driver.
I think anyone launching a reverse engineering effort should
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 12:59 +1000, roucaries bastien wrote:
They post on this list 1 year and a half ago no answer.
I guess everyone on LKML has day jobs now, no one has time for fun stuff
like reverse engineering drivers anymore... :-(
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Aug 11, 2005, at 23:17:07, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 12:59 +1000, roucaries bastien wrote:
They post on this list 1 year and a half ago no answer.
I guess everyone on LKML has day jobs now, no one has time for fun
stuff
like reverse engineering drivers anymore... :-(
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On Tuesday, 9 of August 2005 15:52, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
>
>>On Aug 9, 2005, at 05:09:55, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Third, both ndiswrapper and binary-only drivers only work on one
>>>platform.
>>>
>>>E.g. broadcom has a binary-only driver for their WLAN
On Tuesday, 9 of August 2005 15:52, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2005, at 05:09:55, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > Third, both ndiswrapper and binary-only drivers only work on one
> > platform.
> >
> > E.g. broadcom has a binary-only driver for their WLAN card on
> > Linux, but
> > only for
On Aug 9, 2005, at 05:09:55, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Third, both ndiswrapper and binary-only drivers only work on one
platform.
E.g. broadcom has a binary-only driver for their WLAN card on
Linux, but
only for mipsel (wrt54g).
On Alpha or PowerPC, most WLAN equipment doesn't work under
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>I see at least two disadvantages:
>
>First, it doesn't encourage hardware manufacturers to support open
>source development.
>
>Linux has only a small market share, but it's slowly growing.
>
>Linux driver support does sometimes influence the decision which
>hardware to buy.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I see at least two disadvantages:
First, it doesn't encourage hardware manufacturers to support open
source development.
Linux has only a small market share, but it's slowly growing.
Linux driver support does sometimes influence the decision which
hardware to buy.
With
On Aug 9, 2005, at 05:09:55, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Third, both ndiswrapper and binary-only drivers only work on one
platform.
E.g. broadcom has a binary-only driver for their WLAN card on
Linux, but
only for mipsel (wrt54g).
On Alpha or PowerPC, most WLAN equipment doesn't work under
On Tuesday, 9 of August 2005 15:52, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 05:09:55, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Third, both ndiswrapper and binary-only drivers only work on one
platform.
E.g. broadcom has a binary-only driver for their WLAN card on
Linux, but
only for mipsel
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 of August 2005 15:52, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 05:09:55, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Third, both ndiswrapper and binary-only drivers only work on one
platform.
E.g. broadcom has a binary-only driver for their WLAN card on
Linux, but
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 01:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:06:58PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> With NdisWrapper, the hardware manufacturer can say:
> "Our hardware is supported through the open source
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:06:58PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
> > uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
> > that don't care about
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> > Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
> > uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
> > that don't care about Linux.
>
> If you are
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Any idea how much hardware is out there that needs
>> ndiswrapper to work?
>>>
>>> No real idea but an educated guess: too much...
>>>
>>
>> I like the idea of blacklisting anything with a native driver (even a
>> partially working one), but
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
> uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
> that don't care about Linux.
If you are always speccing out new systems then of course, but
> > > Any idea how much hardware is out there that needs
> ndiswrapper to work?
> >
> > No real idea but an educated guess: too much...
> >
>
> I like the idea of blacklisting anything with a native driver (even a
> partially working one), but leaving alone the stuff that is completely
>
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:24 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> >
> >>I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
> >>(one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
>
>>I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
>>(one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really need
>>wlan there is http://zd1211.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> Any idea
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
> (one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really need
> wlan there is http://zd1211.sourceforge.net/
Any idea how much hardware is out there
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>Is the Linksys
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:50 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> It doesn't actually say it works on Linux. Perhaps you wanted
> mysticgooglepsychic.com? ;-)
>
> I don't think it is reasonable to expect google to know what ndiswrapper
> is ... or perhaps it just has a taste filter installed? ;-)
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> > > supported?
> >
> > Normally, linksys
On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> > supported?
>
> Normally, linksys doesn't care much about Linux and they won't even
> release info for a
On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
Normally, linksys doesn't care much about Linux and they won't even
release info for a driver.
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
Normally, linksys doesn't care much
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:50 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
It doesn't actually say it works on Linux. Perhaps you wanted
mysticgooglepsychic.com? ;-)
I don't think it is reasonable to expect google to know what ndiswrapper
is ... or perhaps it just has a taste filter installed? ;-)
True,
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 13:48 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 09:31 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2005 03:39, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
(one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really need
wlan there is http://zd1211.sourceforge.net/
Any idea how much hardware is out there that
Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
(one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really need
wlan there is http://zd1211.sourceforge.net/
Any idea how much
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:24 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:13 +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
I gave up on my laptop's built in Inprocomm IPN 2220 quite some time ago
(one more reason not to like Cisco). In the rare cases I do really need
wlan
Any idea how much hardware is out there that needs
ndiswrapper to work?
No real idea but an educated guess: too much...
I like the idea of blacklisting anything with a native driver (even a
partially working one), but leaving alone the stuff that is completely
unsupported.
Lee
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
that don't care about Linux.
If you are always speccing out new systems then of course, but in
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Any idea how much hardware is out there that needs
ndiswrapper to work?
No real idea but an educated guess: too much...
I like the idea of blacklisting anything with a native driver (even a
partially working one), but leaving alone the stuff
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
that don't care about Linux.
If you are always
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:06:58PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Again, the point is that ndiswrapper is a great project, but people
uses it for the leftovers! We *shouldn't* buy leftovers or from Manuf
that don't care about Linux.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 01:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:06:58PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:56 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
With NdisWrapper, the hardware manufacturer can say:
Our hardware is supported through the open source NdisWrapper.
--Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Sunday, August 07, 2005 15:56:06
-0400):
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>> Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
>> supported?
>>
>
> Wow, Google has really declined in quality. I got zero hits for
>
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 21:20 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 18:39 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> > > supported?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 18:39 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> > supported?
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Lee
>
> Normally, linksys doesn't care much about Linux and they won't
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> supported?
>
> TIA,
>
> Lee
Normally, linksys doesn't care much about Linux and they won't even
release info for a driver. Yeah, they have some open info for the WRT's
but the
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
> supported?
>
Wow, Google has really declined in quality. I got zero hits for
"Linksys WUSB 54G linux". Then I found this page on my own.
(from
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
TIA,
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
TIA,
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
Wow, Google has really declined in quality. I got zero hits for
Linksys WUSB 54G linux. Then I found this page on my own.
(from
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
TIA,
Lee
Normally, linksys doesn't care much about Linux and they won't even
release info for a driver. Yeah, they have some open info for the WRT's
but the
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 18:39 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
TIA,
Lee
Normally, linksys doesn't care much about Linux and they won't even
release
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 21:20 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 18:39 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
TIA,
Lee
Normally,
--Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Sunday, August 07, 2005 15:56:06
-0400):
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 15:22 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Is the Linksys WUSB 54GS wireless adapter (FCCID Q87-WUSB54GS)
supported?
Wow, Google has really declined in quality. I got zero hits for
Linksys
56 matches
Mail list logo
