Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:56:17 +0100 > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and > > some patched binutils 2.17, and avr32 is currently the only architec

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 04:23:12PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > You didn't explain how for example your trunk [1] is related to mainline > > [2]. > > nano `find -name ChangeLog.bfin` > > read the ChangeLog and the associated commit. this is exactly the > same way gcc works. you want to know wha

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Dec 14, 2007 3:55 PM, Robert Schwebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:35:36PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > Upstream plus a well defined patch stack with well documented patches > > > would definitely be preferred here. > > Well, tell me that it is wrong, but isn't i

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:35:36PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Upstream plus a well defined patch stack with well documented patches > > would definitely be preferred here. Well, tell me that it is wrong, but isn't it common community methodology to have rebasable things like patch stacks or

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Dec 14, 2007 3:28 PM, Robert Schwebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:21:45PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > Is an upstream toolchain available which is able to build blackfin? > > > > binutils -- yes > > uClibc -- yes (for FLAT) > > gcc -- yes and no > > > > we have

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:21:45PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Is an upstream toolchain available which is able to build blackfin? > > binutils -- yes > uClibc -- yes (for FLAT) > gcc -- yes and no > > we have some pieces in gcc, but if you want an > up-to-date-tested-known-working combination

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Dec 14, 2007 3:03 PM, Robert Schwebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:56:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and > > some patched binutils 2.17, and avr32 is currently the only architecture > > in the ker

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:56:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and > some patched binutils 2.17, and avr32 is currently the only architecture > in the kernel where upstream of both of them is not capable of building > a kernel

Re: Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-14 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:56:17 +0100 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and > some patched binutils 2.17, and avr32 is currently the only architecture > in the kernel where upstream of both of them is not capable of buildin

Working upstream toolchain for avr32?

2007-12-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
AFAIK the latest available AVR32 toolchains are some patched gcc 4.0 and some patched binutils 2.17, and avr32 is currently the only architecture in the kernel where upstream of both of them is not capable of building a kernel for the architecture. ALthough not technically a requirement, it wou