Hi!
Any News?
Stefan
Stefan Priebe - FH schrieb:
Hi!
OK - i rechecked everything. We've 22 Servers with the DFI PM-12
Mainboard with VIA Chipset.
But only the 5 oldest of them (before 2004 / 01 / 20) (we've buyed all
in a range of 10 month) have this problem.
So i think it is a mixture
Hi!
OK - i rechecked everything. We've 22 Servers with the DFI PM-12
Mainboard with VIA Chipset.
But only the 5 oldest of them (before 2004 / 01 / 20) (we've buyed all
in a range of 10 month) have this problem.
So i think it is a mixture of software and hardware problem. Perhaps DFI
change
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> > What is different about these servers?
> All 300 machines are mostly different. We have Dual Opteron, single P4
> with HT, single P4 without HT, Dual Xeon, Athlon 64 X2, and many
> more... different mainboards etc.
>
> The only thing i found out is, that all these serv
Hi Chuck,
hi Eric,
cause you both asked me nearly the same i will answer you both in one mail.
> What is different about these servers?
All 300 machines are mostly different. We have Dual Opteron, single P4
with HT, single P4 without HT, Dual Xeon, Athlon 64 X2, and many more...
different
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mhm are you shure? I mean i have this problem on 5 servers - all with
> the same mainboard. I cannot believe, that all 5 servers have a
> hardware problem that starts on the same day.
>
> The other thing is - that they all work fine with 2.6.16.x and all
> other
Hi!
Mhm are you shure? I mean i have this problem on 5 servers - all with
the same mainboard. I cannot believe, that all 5 servers have a hardware
problem that starts on the same day.
The other thing is - that they all work fine with 2.6.16.x and all other
kernels before. I mean some of them
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> Sorry that is not possible - cause it is a production machine.
>
> But i've catched the error and the files from another machine -
> perhaps this helps.
>
> "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> address 0288"
> " printing eip:"
> "c0142f
Hi!
Sorry that is not possible - cause it is a production machine.
But i've catched the error and the files from another machine - perhaps
this helps.
"BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 0288"
" printing eip:"
"c0142ff7"
"*pde = "
"Oops: 000
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> It could be, that the options are now different - cause i my first try
> was to change the kernel options - if that did not help i switched
> back to 2.6.16.37.
>
> Any idea what i can do?
>
> Chuck Ebbert schrieb:
>> That doesn't match your oops at all. Did you use a d
Hi!
It could be, that the options are now different - cause i my first try
was to change the kernel options - if that did not help i switched back
to 2.6.16.37.
Any idea what i can do?
Stefan
Chuck Ebbert schrieb:
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
Hi!
I do everything you like :-) if we can find
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I do everything you like :-) if we can find the bug.
>
> So here are the files (2.6.18.6):
> http://server055.de-nserver.de/filemap.o
> http://server055.de-nserver.de/filemap.s
>
>>
>> If you can, post the file mm/filemap.o from your build directory to some
>> we
Hi!
I do everything you like :-) if we can find the bug.
So here are the files (2.6.18.6):
http://server055.de-nserver.de/filemap.o
http://server055.de-nserver.de/filemap.s
Stefan
Chuck Ebbert schrieb:
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
I've 3 Servers which works wonderful with 2.6.16.X (also teste
Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> I've 3 Servers which works wonderful with 2.6.16.X (also testet the
> latest 2.6.16.37)
>
> but with 2.6.18.6 i get these errors:
>
> "general protection fault: [#1]"
> "Modules linked in:"
> "CPU:0"
> "EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI"
> "EFLAGS: 00010246 (
Hi!
I can give you an idea of the workload :-) I have the same problem on an
nearly idle Server. There runs only a few cronjobs (normal Debian System
crons).
The load was not higher than 0.01 on this system the last 3 days and
this morning it crashes with the same error.
I've not tested 2.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:07:23AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The update of the IDE layer was in 2.6.19. I don't think it is a
> hardware bug cause all these 5 machines runs fine since a few years with
> 2.6.16.X and before. We switch to 2.6.18.6 on monday last week and all
> ma
Hi!
I've another idea... could it be, that it is a barrier problem? Since
barriers are enabled by default from 2.6.17 on ...
Stefan
David Chinner schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
Hi!
I'm not shure but perhaps it isn't an XFS Bug.
Here is what i
Hi!
The update of the IDE layer was in 2.6.19. I don't think it is a
hardware bug cause all these 5 machines runs fine since a few years with
2.6.16.X and before. We switch to 2.6.18.6 on monday last week and all
machines began to crash periodically. On friday last week we downgraded
them all
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm not shure but perhaps it isn't an XFS Bug.
>
> Here is what i find out:
>
> We've about 300 servers at the momentan and 5 of them are "old" Intel
> Pentium 4 Machines with a DFI PM-12 Mainboard with VIA chipset.
Hi!
I'm not shure but perhaps it isn't an XFS Bug.
Here is what i find out:
We've about 300 servers at the momentan and 5 of them are "old" Intel
Pentium 4 Machines with a DFI PM-12 Mainboard with VIA chipset. It only
happens on THESE Machines. Other P4 Machines with a Tyan Mainboard or a
G
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:30:15PM +0100, Stefan Priebe - FH wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've 3 Servers which works wonderful with 2.6.16.X (also testet the
> latest 2.6.16.37)
>
> but with 2.6.18.6 i get these errors:
[ EIP is at xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay+0x58d/0x59b ]
[ EIP is at generic_file_buf
Hello!
I've 3 Servers which works wonderful with 2.6.16.X (also testet the
latest 2.6.16.37)
but with 2.6.18.6 i get these errors:
"general protection fault: [#1]"
"Modules linked in:"
"CPU:0"
"EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI"
"EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.18.6 #1) "
"EIP is at xfs_bmap_
21 matches
Mail list logo
