On Thursday, 29 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please?
>
> Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases
> resume works. I thing checking the
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
> Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please?
Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases
resume works. I thing checking the patch is hard when I have no real
procedure to reproduce the resume
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please?
Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases
resume works. I thing checking the patch is hard when I have no real
procedure to reproduce the resume
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Thursday, 29 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please?
Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases
resume works. I thing checking the patch is
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> > > > Now there's a message that I haven't seen in
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> > > Now there's a message that I haven't seen in about 3 years.
> > >
> > > It indicates that the linux inode
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing
> >
> > # echo testproc > /sys/power/disk
> > # echo disk > /sys/power/state
>
> This is suspend to RAM,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
> On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing
>
> # echo testproc > /sys/power/disk
> # echo disk > /sys/power/state
This is suspend to RAM, not to disk.
Regards,
Tino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing
# echo testproc /sys/power/disk
# echo disk /sys/power/state
This is suspend to RAM, not to disk.
Regards,
Tino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing
# echo testproc /sys/power/disk
# echo disk /sys/power/state
This is suspend to RAM, not to disk.
I
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
Now there's a message that I haven't seen in about 3 years.
It indicates that the linux inode connected to
On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
Now there's a message that I haven't seen in about 3
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > No. I'd
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
> > >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
> > >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
[...]
No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
reproducable?
No. I
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
[...]
No. I'd say something got
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
> > reproducable?
>
> No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
[...]
> No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
> reproducable?
No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such
failures. I restart squid during the resume prosecure, and the above
Oops lead
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
[...]
No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
reproducable?
No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such
failures. I restart squid during the resume prosecure, and the above
Oops lead
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
[...]
No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
reproducable?
No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such
failures.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c
> printing eip:
> c022807f
> *pde =
> Oops: [#1]
> SMP
> Modules
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
Hi,
after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c
printing eip:
c022807f
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in:
Hi,
after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c
printing eip:
c022807f
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: dvb_usb_cinergyT2 i915 drm cpufreq_stats usblp
firewire_ohci
Hi,
after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c
printing eip:
c022807f
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: dvb_usb_cinergyT2 i915 drm cpufreq_stats usblp
firewire_ohci
31 matches
Mail list logo
