I had the same problem, and some other strange problems, booting with the
'noapic' option solved them ...
(sorry for the late reply, I was still testing the machine... )
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Eugenio Mastroviti wrote:
> This is possibly not the best place to post this message, but if anybody
> co
ernel 2.2.16 without any modification, is running fine in
spite of the bigger load on it (more threads, larger memory usage)
Eugenio Mastroviti
Systems Administrator
Go Internet Ltd
Jun 27 23:57:36 primitivo kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
Jun 27 23:57:36 primitivo last message rep
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's what i've found today in logs:
>
> Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
> Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
> Feb 13 0
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's what i've found today in logs:
>
> Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
> Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
> Feb 13 0
Hi,
Here's what i've found today in logs:
Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: ed.
Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
Feb 13 02:
I've got the above message from 2.4.0-test10-1.
Don't know test9
--
Lorenzo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
6 matches
Mail list logo
