H.P.Anvin wrote:
> >
> > glibc already contains such a wrapper; it is called __clone(). At
> > least my system has "man clone" show the man page for it.
> >
>
> Actually, the man page is wrong, it's called clone() unless you define
>
> a function with that name yourself (weak symbol.) My version
Followup to: <9c77p7$upd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> glibc already contains such a wrapper; it is called __clone(). At
> least my system has "man clone" show the man page for it.
>
Actually, the man page is wrong, it
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Francesc Oller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Hi all,
>
> Some days before I asked for a fork-like C-wrapper for clone() which
> could be used like fork() thinking that somebody could have done it
> before but I only received
Hi all,
Some days before I asked for a fork-like C-wrapper for clone() which
could be used like fork() thinking that somebody could have done it
before but I only received two e-mails saying that probably it
wasn't worth it or even it was complete non-sense.
Therefore, I've done it myself. Code
4 matches
Mail list logo
