David S. Miller wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wagner)
>
> How could it be for another connection, if it has source and
> destination port numbers?
>
>Consider previously existing connections with the same src/dst/ports
>and the effects of massive packet reordering and other transmi
Hello!
> namely, it only happens with probability 1/2^32 (you hope).
This can happen with probability close to 1 or even exactly 1,
depending on sequence number selection algorithm.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMA
Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 09:06:31PM +, David Wagner wrote:
>> David S. Miller wrote:
>> >Linux should not honor the incorrect sequence number. If the sequence
>> >number is incorrect, the RST could legitimately be for another
>> >connection.
>>
>> How could it be for anothe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wagner)
Date:6 Oct 2000 21:06:31 GMT
How could it be for another connection, if it has source and
destination port numbers?
Consider previously existing connections with the same src/dst/ports
and the effects of massive packet reordering and oth
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 09:06:31PM +, David Wagner wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> >Linux should not honor the incorrect sequence number. If the sequence
> >number is incorrect, the RST could legitimately be for another
> >connection.
>
> How could it be for another connection, if it has s
David S. Miller wrote:
>Linux should not honor the incorrect sequence number. If the sequence
>number is incorrect, the RST could legitimately be for another
>connection.
How could it be for another connection, if it has source and destination
port numbers? I thought the sequence number was the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Alan Curry wrote:
> Questions:
>
> 1. Could/should the Linux kernel be patched to recognize the one-off sequence
>number and return ECONNREFUSED?
Nope, the sequence number could be correct for another Connection.
> 2. If th
From: "Alan Curry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:03:55 -0500 (EST)
3. Does anybody know where to file a bug report on the Sega
Dreamcast TCP?
Eventually it should reach Microsoft, since if I remember correctly
the dreamcast uses their networking stack.
Linux
Usually, when I try to connect to a port with nothing listening on it, it
looks like this:
17:11:20.809712 eth0 > MYHOST.2514 > OTHERHOST.auth: S 2807001202:2807001202(0) win
32120 (DF)
17:11:20.819712 eth0 < OTHERHOST.auth > MYHOST.2514: R 0:0(0) ack 2807001203 win 0
MYHOST is my Linux box. T
9 matches
Mail list logo