Re: alsa was Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT

2007-03-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >>download & install alsalib > >>download & install alsautils > >>create 1007 nodes in /dev > > I really hope you meant permission 1007 nodes, not 1007 nodes! I'm > checking right now, and if the latter is the case, I'm going to > uninstall alsa, even if that means my compute

Re: alsa was Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT

2007-03-15 Thread Zachary Amsden
Pavel Machek wrote: download & install alsalib download & install alsautils create 1007 nodes in /dev I really hope you meant permission 1007 nodes, not 1007 nodes! I'm checking right now, and if the latter is the case, I'm going to uninstall alsa, even if that means

Re: alsa was Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT

2007-03-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > So... in dsp, if I wanted to record sound, I did > > cat /dev/dsp > /tmp/foo; cat /tmp/foo > /dev/dsp > > If that worked, I had usable sound system, and if it broke, I knew it > is kernel fault. > > With alsa it is > > download & install alsalib > download & install al

Re: alsa was Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT

2007-03-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > >I think the sound example to the right really shows it. > > > >/dev/dsp has a > > > >consistent ABI on a ton of systems. The API below it, > > > >varies. Linux got > > > >file_operations and ALSA. Solaris/BSD may have its > > > >vnode-and-so-on-functions and some sort of OSS. > > > >

Re: alsa was Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT

2007-03-14 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > >I think the sound example to the right really shows it. > > >/dev/dsp has a > > >consistent ABI on a ton of systems. The API below it, > > >varies. Linux got > > >file_operations and ALSA. Solaris/BSD may have its > > >vnode-and-so-on-functi

alsa was Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT

2007-03-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >I think the sound example to the right really shows it. > >/dev/dsp has a > >consistent ABI on a ton of systems. The API below it, > >varies. Linux got > >file_operations and ALSA. Solaris/BSD may have its > >vnode-and-so-on-functions and some sort of OSS. > > I think this is a poor exam