Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:35:30PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> > So, you think that the aperture moving to a different location on every
> > boot is what the BIOS desires? Is it normal for it to move so much?
>
> Beats me. I gave up trying to understa
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:35:30PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> So, you think that the aperture moving to a different location on every
> boot is what the BIOS desires? Is it normal for it to move so much?
Beats me. I gave up trying to understand BIOS authors motivations years ago.
> The cur
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:47:32PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> In amd64-agp.c, would it be dangerous to remove the "aperture base > 4G"
> thing and instead simply only read the rightmost 7 bits to ensure the
> aperture base is always in range? (This is coming from someone
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:47:32PM -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> In amd64-agp.c, would it be dangerous to remove the "aperture base > 4G"
> thing and instead simply only read the rightmost 7 bits to ensure the
> aperture base is always in range? (This is coming from someone with
> little AGP
Hi Dave,
I'm working on a solution for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6350
Certain BIOSes are screwing with the K8 aperture base value. However,
these systems work after booting into windows and then rebooting into Linux.
It originally appeared to be a bug specific to asrock mot
5 matches
Mail list logo
