Re: apm system does not power off anymore

2007-10-19 Thread Olaf Hering
On Sun, Oct 14, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:26 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone know what is required to power off an old PIII 400mhz > > system? At some point (2.6.18 I think), apm=power-off was required with > > an SMP kernel. Now with 2.6.22 a

Re: apm system does not power off anymore

2007-10-17 Thread Olaf Hering
On Sun, Oct 14, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:26 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone know what is required to power off an old PIII 400mhz > > system? At some point (2.6.18 I think), apm=power-off was required with > > an SMP kernel. Now with 2.6.22 a

Re: apm system does not power off anymore

2007-10-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:37:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Also, it's bad that the operator has to provide some special boot > > command-line > > option to make the machine work properly. Pl

Re: apm system does not power off anymore

2007-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, it's bad that the operator has to provide some special boot command-line > option to make the machine work properly. Please consider this to be a > bug. Has it always needed apm=power-off? It has always been th

Re: apm system does not power off anymore

2007-10-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:26 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know what is required to power off an old PIII 400mhz > system? At some point (2.6.18 I think), apm=power-off was required with > an SMP kernel. Now with 2.6.22 and 2.6.23, even that does not work > anymore. W