On Sun, Oct 14, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:26 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what is required to power off an old PIII 400mhz
> > system? At some point (2.6.18 I think), apm=power-off was required with
> > an SMP kernel. Now with 2.6.22 a
On Sun, Oct 14, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:26 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what is required to power off an old PIII 400mhz
> > system? At some point (2.6.18 I think), apm=power-off was required with
> > an SMP kernel. Now with 2.6.22 a
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:37:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Also, it's bad that the operator has to provide some special boot
> > command-line
> > option to make the machine work properly. Pl
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:23:16 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also, it's bad that the operator has to provide some special boot command-line
> option to make the machine work properly. Please consider this to be a
> bug. Has it always needed apm=power-off?
It has always been th
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:26 +0200 Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know what is required to power off an old PIII 400mhz
> system? At some point (2.6.18 I think), apm=power-off was required with
> an SMP kernel. Now with 2.6.22 and 2.6.23, even that does not work
> anymore.
W
5 matches
Mail list logo