On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2015/3/30 9:46, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> > On 2015/3/30 8:43, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >>> On 2015/3/26 21:23, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >>>
> Here are two panic logs from smart phone test, and the kernel version is
>
On 2015/3/30 9:46, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2015/3/30 8:43, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>> On 2015/3/26 21:23, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>
Here are two panic logs from smart phone test, and the kernel version is
v3.10.
log1 is "Unable to handle kerne
On 2015/3/30 8:43, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On 2015/3/26 21:23, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>
>>> Here are two panic logs from smart phone test, and the kernel version is
>>> v3.10.
>>>
>>> log1 is "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
>>> c0704da
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2015/3/26 21:23, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>
> > Here are two panic logs from smart phone test, and the kernel version is
> > v3.10.
> >
> > log1 is "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> > c0704da020", it should be ffc0704da020, right
On 2015/3/26 21:23, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> Here are two panic logs from smart phone test, and the kernel version is
> v3.10.
>
> log1 is "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> c0704da020", it should be ffc0704da020, right?
> and log2 is "Unable to handle kernel paging requ
Here are two panic logs from smart phone test, and the kernel version is v3.10.
log1 is "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c0704da020",
it should be ffc0704da020, right?
and log2 is "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
1e000796", it should be fff
6 matches
Mail list logo