On 11/12/18 8:27 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:15:47 -0600
> Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 11/8/18 12:14 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/8/18 6:00 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-11-06 15:34:55 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:15:47 -0600
Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi,
> On 11/8/18 12:14 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/8/18 6:00 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >> On 2018-11-06 15:34:55 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> Do anybody tri
On 11/8/18 12:14 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 11/8/18 6:00 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 2018-11-06 15:34:55 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Do anybody tried to use ARM64 RT with 76K pages enabled?
>>
>> 75 would be an off by one but this :)
>
On 11/07/2018 03:04 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Do anybody tried to use ARM64 RT with 76K pages enabled?
>
> My attempt shows that enabling CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y increases latencies
> by ~30%
Depends on what the workload is actually doing. 64K pages should help if
the mapp
On 11/8/18 6:00 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-11-06 15:34:55 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi All,
Hi,
Do anybody tried to use ARM64 RT with 76K pages enabled?
75 would be an off by one but this :)
Ops 8-). at least subj is correct.
My attempt shows that enabling
On 2018-11-06 15:34:55 [-0600], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi,
> Do anybody tried to use ARM64 RT with 76K pages enabled?
75 would be an off by one but this :)
> My attempt shows that enabling CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y increases latencies
> by ~30%
>
> cyclictest -n -m -Sp98 -q -D2m wi
Hi All,
Do anybody tried to use ARM64 RT with 76K pages enabled?
My attempt shows that enabling CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y increases latencies by
~30%
cyclictest -n -m -Sp98 -q -D2m with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y
T: 0 ( 772) P:98 I:1000 C: 12 Min: 7 Act: 13 Avg: 10 Max: 8
7 matches
Mail list logo