Re: axp question 'bout uname voodoo

2007-03-20 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 20 2007 09:17, Oliver Falk wrote: > > But on i386 it reports: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -mpi > i686 i686 i386 Reports this for me: $ uname -mpi i686 athlon i386 > And I remember that it used to report alphaev67 or alphaev56... Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

Re: axp question 'bout uname voodoo

2007-03-20 Thread Oliver Falk
Hi Eric! On 03/19/2007 06:44 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Oliver Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ ... ] The kernel uname function at least does not have fields that report processor or hardware platform. But on i386 it reports: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -mpi i686 i686 i386 And I remembe

Re: axp question 'bout uname voodoo

2007-03-19 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Oliver Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > We have a discussion on alpha mailinglist at the moment, because of uname > -mpi. > > AFAIK, uname -m should do some glibc call, which calls kernel, right? > > However, I have two machines: > > AS1000A: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -mpi && cat /p

axp question 'bout uname voodoo

2007-03-19 Thread Oliver Falk
Hi! We have a discussion on alpha mailinglist at the moment, because of uname -mpi. AFAIK, uname -m should do some glibc call, which calls kernel, right? However, I have two machines: AS1000A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -mpi && cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model alpha alpha alpha cpu model