On 05/05/2020 23:01:19+0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Thanks for the quick replies, both. Unfortunately, being able to read BF
> from linux is not relevant to us - all the handling happens early in the
> bootloader (including clearing BF, so that we can detect that the
> previous boot failed only
On 05/05/2020 22.38, Bruno Thomsen wrote:
> Hi Rasmus
>
> Den tir. 5. maj 2020 kl. 22.07 skrev Alexandre Belloni
> :
>>
>> On 05/05/2020 21:54:47+0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> Hi Bruno
>>>
>>> I just noticed your "rtc: pcf2127: add tamper detection support"
>>> (03623b4b04) from 5.4. Unfortuna
Hi Rasmus
Den tir. 5. maj 2020 kl. 22.07 skrev Alexandre Belloni
:
>
> On 05/05/2020 21:54:47+0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > Hi Bruno
> >
> > I just noticed your "rtc: pcf2127: add tamper detection support"
> > (03623b4b04) from 5.4. Unfortunately, clearing the BTSE bit breaks a use
> > case of
On 05/05/2020 21:54:47+0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Hi Bruno
>
> I just noticed your "rtc: pcf2127: add tamper detection support"
> (03623b4b04) from 5.4. Unfortunately, clearing the BTSE bit breaks a use
> case of ours:
>
> We rely on the battery switch-over detection to distinguish a powerfa
Hi Bruno
I just noticed your "rtc: pcf2127: add tamper detection support"
(03623b4b04) from 5.4. Unfortunately, clearing the BTSE bit breaks a use
case of ours:
We rely on the battery switch-over detection to distinguish a powerfail
during boot from a PORESET by the external watchdog (in the latt
5 matches
Mail list logo
