Andrew Morton writes:
> I guess if the bss has zero length then we can skip the zeroing of the end
> of the page at the end of bss, as long as we're dead sure that we didn't
> accidentally instantiate a single page on behalf of that zero-length bss.
There is another thing I noticed about the bss
Nir Tzachar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello.
>
> i am seeing a problem(?) with the patch described at:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=109865760703851=2
> i'm using vanilla 2.6.11 (not .1/.2/.3/.4 ...)
>
> the short version:
> padzero does not alway do the right thing (more
hello.
i am seeing a problem(?) with the patch described at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=109865760703851=2
i'm using vanilla 2.6.11 (not .1/.2/.3/.4 ...)
the short version:
padzero does not alway do the right thing (more correctly, it's caller,
load_elf_binary).
the longer
hello.
i am seeing a problem(?) with the patch described at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=109865760703851w=2
i'm using vanilla 2.6.11 (not .1/.2/.3/.4 ...)
the short version:
padzero does not alway do the right thing (more correctly, it's caller,
load_elf_binary).
the longer
Nir Tzachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello.
i am seeing a problem(?) with the patch described at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=109865760703851w=2
i'm using vanilla 2.6.11 (not .1/.2/.3/.4 ...)
the short version:
padzero does not alway do the right thing (more correctly,
Andrew Morton writes:
I guess if the bss has zero length then we can skip the zeroing of the end
of the page at the end of bss, as long as we're dead sure that we didn't
accidentally instantiate a single page on behalf of that zero-length bss.
There is another thing I noticed about the bss
6 matches
Mail list logo