On Tue, Jan 21 2014, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:58 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes:
> >
> > >> That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
> > >> changes...
> >
> > nab> Ping..? Any updates on a
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:58 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes:
>
> >> That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
> >> changes...
>
> nab> Ping..? Any updates on a proper bugfix for this..?
>
> I did put your patch in my queue
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:58 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes:
That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
changes...
nab Ping..? Any updates on a proper bugfix for this..?
I did put your patch in my queue
On Tue, Jan 21 2014, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:58 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes:
That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
changes...
nab Ping..? Any updates on a
> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes:
>> That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
>> changes...
nab> Ping..? Any updates on a proper bugfix for this..?
I did put your patch in my queue and have been working on a fix for the
partial completion case. The latter
nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes:
That breaks partial completion, though. I'll take a look at Kent's
changes...
nab Ping..? Any updates on a proper bugfix for this..?
I did put your patch in my queue and have been working on a fix for the
partial completion case. The
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 15:09 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes:
>
> nab> Given that bio_integrity_verify() is using bio_for_each_segment(),
> nab> the loop starts from the updated bio->bi_idx, and not a zero value,
> nab> which ends up skipping
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 15:09 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes:
nab Given that bio_integrity_verify() is using bio_for_each_segment(),
nab the loop starts from the updated bio-bi_idx, and not a zero value,
nab which ends up skipping
> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger writes:
nab> Given that bio_integrity_verify() is using bio_for_each_segment(),
nab> the loop starts from the updated bio->bi_idx, and not a zero value,
nab> which ends up skipping individual bio segment calls to
nab> bi->verify_fn().
That's botched. Verify
nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes:
nab Given that bio_integrity_verify() is using bio_for_each_segment(),
nab the loop starts from the updated bio-bi_idx, and not a zero value,
nab which ends up skipping individual bio segment calls to
nab bi-verify_fn().
That's botched.
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 20:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hi Martin & Co,
>
> So after playing with the mainline DIF client against an initial WIP
> target DIF support patch, I've started hitting a bug in
> bio_integrity_verify() that causes READ verify logic to be silently
> skipped for
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 20:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi Martin Co,
So after playing with the mainline DIF client against an initial WIP
target DIF support patch, I've started hitting a bug in
bio_integrity_verify() that causes READ verify logic to be silently
skipped for both
Hi Martin & Co,
So after playing with the mainline DIF client against an initial WIP
target DIF support patch, I've started hitting a bug in
bio_integrity_verify() that causes READ verify logic to be silently
skipped for both WIP target and existing scsi_debug DIF code.
The issue is with the
Hi Martin Co,
So after playing with the mainline DIF client against an initial WIP
target DIF support patch, I've started hitting a bug in
bio_integrity_verify() that causes READ verify logic to be silently
skipped for both WIP target and existing scsi_debug DIF code.
The issue is with the
14 matches
Mail list logo
