On Thu, Mar 10, Tom Rini wrote:
> I've just been using sort by arrival as an imperfect, but still mostly
Just procmail the stuff, if bk cant do it.
:0 f
* ^X-my-mailinglist-tag: bk-commits-head.vger.kernel.org
| formail -i "Date: `env TZ=UTC date -R`"
This doesnt
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:11:45AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's
> > bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set
> > an explicit Date header on
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Now, if James trigger scripts set the date of the email by the date of the
> > commit, that sounds like a misfeature, but you'd better talk to James, not
> > me, since he's the one doing that part..
>
> Hah ok. Which James ?
I was
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's
> bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set
> an explicit Date header on the outgoing emails.
>
> It then becomes a matter of deciding whether
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's
bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set
an explicit Date header on the outgoing emails.
It then becomes a matter of deciding whether this is
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Now, if James trigger scripts set the date of the email by the date of the
commit, that sounds like a misfeature, but you'd better talk to James, not
me, since he's the one doing that part..
Hah ok. Which James ?
I was thinking
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:11:45AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's
bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set
an explicit Date header on the
On Thu, Mar 10, Tom Rini wrote:
I've just been using sort by arrival as an imperfect, but still mostly
Just procmail the stuff, if bk cant do it.
:0 f
* ^X-my-mailinglist-tag: bk-commits-head.vger.kernel.org
| formail -i Date: `env TZ=UTC date -R`
This doesnt help
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
> > commit messages for the
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
> commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day
Two's company ...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> While we are at such requests ...
>
> When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages
> are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch
> in the netdev tree.
>
> For
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
> would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
> commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day you
> pulled, and not the day
While we are at such requests ...
When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages
are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch
in the netdev tree.
For example, if Jeff commited a patch from somebody in his netdev tree 3
weeks ago, and you pull
While we are at such requests ...
When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages
are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch
in the netdev tree.
For example, if Jeff commited a patch from somebody in his netdev tree 3
weeks ago, and you pull
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day you
pulled, and not the day when
Two's company ...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
While we are at such requests ...
When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages
are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch
in the netdev tree.
For example, if
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day you
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
commit
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the
commit messages for the csets in that
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it
would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk
22 matches
Mail list logo
