Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 14:23 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
>
> On Jan 29 2007 13:44, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >What use is it to modularly compile something that almost everybody needs?
>
> [correction: meant CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD, because CONFIG_MD itself does
> not generate any code]
>
> So just beca
On Jan 29 2007 13:44, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 13:40 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
>> >Is that an real-live issue, with distro kernels being shipped with
>> >almost everything compiled as module these days?
>>
>> For me it was. FC6 has at least CONFIG_MD=y, and SUSE also has
>>
Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 13:40 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> >Is that an real-live issue, with distro kernels being shipped with
> >almost everything compiled as module these days?
>
> For me it was. FC6 has at least CONFIG_MD=y, and SUSE also has some =y that
> could be =m with the help of module a
On Jan 29 2007 12:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jan 29 2007 09:30, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-27 15:53]:
brokenmodules=..., but that's SUSE's linuxrc.
>>> good enough to boot the rescue system from
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 29 2007 09:30, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Bernhard Walle wrote:
>>> * Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-27 15:53]:
>>> brokenmodules=..., but that's SUSE's linuxrc.
>> good enough to boot the rescue system from the install cd without
>> oopsing and fix up the b
On Jan 29 2007 09:30, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>Bernhard Walle wrote:
>> * Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-27 15:53]:
>> brokenmodules=..., but that's SUSE's linuxrc.
>
>good enough to boot the rescue system from the install cd without
>oopsing and fix up the blacklist file in the installe
Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-27 15:53]:
> brokenmodules=..., but that's SUSE's linuxrc.
good enough to boot the rescue system from the install cd without
oopsing and fix up the blacklist file in the installed systen though ;)
Trying to boot into single use
* Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-27 15:53]:
>
> On Jan 27 2007 02:22, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >i was wondering whether there exists any mechanism to blacklist modules
> >from being loaded besides the typical etc/modprobe.d/blacklist type
> >mechanisms. Sometimes you have a module
On Jan 27 2007 02:22, Florian Schmidt wrote:
>
>i was wondering whether there exists any mechanism to blacklist modules
>from being loaded besides the typical etc/modprobe.d/blacklist type
>mechanisms. Sometimes you have a module oopsing because of faulty hw
>which cannot be removed rendering the
9 matches
Mail list logo
