On 11/11/16 at 08:44am, Jay Rouman wrote:
> The part that confuses me is that the kernels that I use are custom
> configured for a particular machine. I don't use initramfs or even
> allow module loading. All the drivers are actually in the kernel. As
> far as I know, no firmware is loaded.
On 11/11/16 at 08:44am, Jay Rouman wrote:
> The part that confuses me is that the kernels that I use are custom
> configured for a particular machine. I don't use initramfs or even
> allow module loading. All the drivers are actually in the kernel. As
> far as I know, no firmware is loaded.
The part that confuses me is that the kernels that I use are custom
configured for a particular machine. I don't use initramfs or even
allow module loading. All the drivers are actually in the kernel. As
far as I know, no firmware is loaded. But the regression stops the BNX2
NIC from being
The part that confuses me is that the kernels that I use are custom
configured for a particular machine. I don't use initramfs or even
allow module loading. All the drivers are actually in the kernel. As
far as I know, no firmware is loaded. But the regression stops the BNX2
NIC from being
Dear Jay,
On 11/10/16 19:19, Jay Rouman wrote:
Did this get pushed upstream? I see a new patch for 4.8.7 but the BNX2
regression doesn't seem to be fixed. Or am I missing something?
I don’t think Baoquan’s patch is ready yet.
I guess he will put you in the receivers list, once he sends it
Dear Jay,
On 11/10/16 19:19, Jay Rouman wrote:
Did this get pushed upstream? I see a new patch for 4.8.7 but the BNX2
regression doesn't seem to be fixed. Or am I missing something?
I don’t think Baoquan’s patch is ready yet.
I guess he will put you in the receivers list, once he sends it
Did this get pushed upstream? I see a new patch for 4.8.7 but the BNX2
regression doesn't seem to be fixed. Or am I missing something?
--
Jay Rouman (j...@edzone.net)
Gratiot/Isabella RESD, Ithaca, MI
> Yes, Paul has reported this. Sorry about this!
>
> Will work on it right away.
>
> Thanks
Did this get pushed upstream? I see a new patch for 4.8.7 but the BNX2
regression doesn't seem to be fixed. Or am I missing something?
--
Jay Rouman (j...@edzone.net)
Gratiot/Isabella RESD, Ithaca, MI
> Yes, Paul has reported this. Sorry about this!
>
> Will work on it right away.
>
> Thanks
Yes, Paul has reported this. Sorry about this!
Will work on it right away.
Thanks
Baoquan
On 11/08/16 at 11:50pm, Frank Reppin wrote:
> Hellos,
>
> ... firmware loading seems to be somewhat broken now with/since
>
>
Yes, Paul has reported this. Sorry about this!
Will work on it right away.
Thanks
Baoquan
On 11/08/16 at 11:50pm, Frank Reppin wrote:
> Hellos,
>
> ... firmware loading seems to be somewhat broken now with/since
>
>
Hellos,
... firmware loading seems to be somewhat broken now with/since
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c?id=3e1be7ad2d38c6bd6aeef96df9bd0a7822f4e51c
which gives me - on 4.8.6:
bnx2 :05:00.0: Direct firmware
Hellos,
... firmware loading seems to be somewhat broken now with/since
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c?id=3e1be7ad2d38c6bd6aeef96df9bd0a7822f4e51c
which gives me - on 4.8.6:
bnx2 :05:00.0: Direct firmware
12 matches
Mail list logo
