Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
>
>> On the policy side: some files are not applicable to some types of
>> bonds, and return a single linefeed in that case. Except for one
>> single case, which returns 'NA\n'. The patch changes
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
On the policy side: some files are not applicable to some types of
bonds, and return a single linefeed in that case. Except for one
single case, which returns 'NA\n'. The patch changes these
Hi Wagner,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> On the policy side: some files are not applicable to some types of
> bonds, and return a single linefeed in that case. Except for one
> single case, which returns 'NA\n'. The patch changes these cases into
> emtpy files.
Hi Wagner,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
On the policy side: some files are not applicable to some types of
bonds, and return a single linefeed in that case. Except for one
single case, which returns 'NA\n'. The patch changes these cases into
emtpy files.
IMHO a
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> - raise patches against the latest Linus tree
>>> (ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)
>>
>> I thought it was better to change to git. Isn't it so?
>>
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - raise patches against the latest Linus tree
> > (ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)
>
> I thought it was better to change to git. Isn't it so?
Yes, git is a bit more uptodate than the
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Trailing NULs are present in each file under /sys/class/net/*/bonding
>> and also in /sys/class/net/bonding_masters. That is, in every file
>> provided by
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
> >>
> >> $ od -c
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100 Wagner Ferenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
$ od -c
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100 Wagner Ferenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trailing NULs are present in each file under /sys/class/net/*/bonding
and also in /sys/class/net/bonding_masters. That is, in every file
provided by
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- raise patches against the latest Linus tree
(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)
I thought it was better to change to git. Isn't it so?
Yes, git is a bit more uptodate than the snapshots. But
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- raise patches against the latest Linus tree
(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)
I thought it was better to change to git. Isn't it so?
SubmittingPatches
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
>>
>> $ od -c /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
>> 000 e t h - l e f t e t h
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
$ od -c /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
000 e t h - l e f t e t h - r i g
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am I totally of the limit with the attached patch against
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c? I'd like to receive some comments,
> as I'm not a kernel developer.
Plese alwayts cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Hi,
Am I totally of the limit with the attached patch against
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c? I'd like to receive some comments,
as I'm not a kernel developer.
I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
$ od -c /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
000 e t h - l
Hi,
Am I totally of the limit with the attached patch against
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c? I'd like to receive some comments,
as I'm not a kernel developer.
I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
$ od -c /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
000 e t h - l
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Am I totally of the limit with the attached patch against
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c? I'd like to receive some comments,
as I'm not a kernel developer.
Plese alwayts cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
18 matches
Mail list logo