On 4/11/18 4:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:47:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:22:37PM -0700, Yonghong Song escreveu:
Look at test bpf-script-test-kbuild.c, I think you can drop
uapi/asm/ptrace.h from include file li
Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:47:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:22:37PM -0700, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > Look at test bpf-script-test-kbuild.c, I think you can drop
> > uapi/asm/ptrace.h from include file list. This way, you do not need
> > __BPF__ in x86
Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:37:46AM -0700, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> Hi, Arnaldo,
> When I studied the bpf compilation issue with latest linus/net-next
> kernel (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10333829/), an alternative
> approach I tried is to use __BPF__ macro.
You mean you used an alternat
Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:22:37PM -0700, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> Look at test bpf-script-test-kbuild.c, I think you can drop
> uapi/asm/ptrace.h from include file list. This way, you do not need
> __BPF__ in x86/include/asm/asm.h. At the same time, you can
> remove __BPF__ as well.
That's even
On 4/11/18 11:39 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:37:46AM -0700, Yonghong Song escreveu:
Hi, Arnaldo,
When I studied the bpf compilation issue with latest linus/net-next
kernel (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10333829/), an alternative
approach I tried is
Hi, Arnaldo,
When I studied the bpf compilation issue with latest linus/net-next
kernel (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10333829/), an alternative
approach I tried is to use __BPF__ macro. The following patch
introduced "#ifndef __BPF__" in arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h for
some inline assembl
6 matches
Mail list logo
