On 5/1/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fair enough, it is a bit of an ugly thing. And I see no measurements there
on what the overall speedup was for any workload.
Ken, which memory model was in use? sparsemem?
discontigmem with config_numa on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 5/1/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, it is a bit of an ugly thing. And I see no measurements there
on what the overall speedup was for any workload.
Ken, which memory model was in use? sparsemem?
discontigmem with config_numa on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
> cache-pipe-buf-page-address-for-non-highmem-arch.patch
I still don't like this one at all. If page_address on x86_64 is too
slow we should fix the root cause.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PR
cache-pipe-buf-page-address-for-non-highmem-arch.patch
I still don't like this one at all. If page_address on x86_64 is too
slow we should fix the root cause.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
4 matches
Mail list logo