On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:17:18PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> rpm -b does not work in opensuse anymore (redirects you to use rpmbuild), and
> I
> bet fedora will do the same, so if you don't have rpm-build, tough luck for
> make rpm.
The point, if I understand it correctly, was that when rpmb
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Nov 26 2007 11:13, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> >>>Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
> >> >>>systems that don't have rpmbuild installed.
> >> >>
> >> >> Those old machines probably do not even run a distro-fabricat
On Nov 26 2007 11:13, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> >>>Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
>> >>>systems that don't have rpmbuild installed.
>> >>
>> >> Those old machines probably do not even run a distro-fabricated
>> >> gcc that would compile a git head kernel.
>> >
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Nov 26 2007 10:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >>>Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
> >>>systems that don't have rpmbuild installed.
> >>
> >> Those old machines probably do not even run a distro-fabricated
> >>
On Nov 26 2007 10:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>>>Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
>>>systems that don't have rpmbuild installed.
>>
>> Those old machines probably do not even run a distro-fabricated gcc that
>> would compile a git head kernel.
>
>well, in a nut
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Nov 26 2007 06:58, Ray Lee wrote:
> >On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
> >> fail thusly:
> >>
> >> rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.6.24rc
On Nov 26 2007 06:58, Ray Lee wrote:
>On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
>> fail thusly:
>>
>> rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.6.24rc3g2ffbb837dirty.tar.gz
>> --target: unknown option
>>
>>
On Nov 26, 2007 7:12 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capab
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
>
> > On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
> > > fail thusly:
> > >
> > > rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
> > fail thusly:
> >
> > rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.6.24rc3g2ffbb837dirty.tar.gz
> > --target: unknown option
>
On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
> fail thusly:
>
> rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.6.24rc3g2ffbb837dirty.tar.gz
> --target: unknown option
>
> so it would make more sense to just require
by that, i mean *requiring* the "rpmbuild" command, and not
accepting "rpm" as a subsititute, as you can read in
scripts/package/Makefile:
# Do we have rpmbuild, otherwise fall back to the older rpm
RPM := $(shell if [ -x "/usr/bin/rpmbuild" ]; then echo rpmbuild; \
else echo
12 matches
Mail list logo
