Re: cgroup access daemon

2013-06-28 Thread Tim Hockin
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Serge Hallyn >> wrote: >> > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Serge Hallyn >> >> wrote: >> >> > Quoting Tim Hockin

Re: cgroup access daemon

2013-06-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Serge Hallyn > >> wrote: > >> > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > > Could you give examples? > > > > If you

Re: cgroup access daemon

2013-06-28 Thread Tim Hockin
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Serge Hallyn >> wrote: >> > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): >> > >> >> For our use case this is a huge problem. We have people who access >> >> cgroup fi

Re: cgroup access daemon

2013-06-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Serge Hallyn > wrote: > > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > > > >> For our use case this is a huge problem. We have people who access > >> cgroup files in a fairly tight loops, polling for information. We > >>

Re: cgroup access daemon

2013-06-27 Thread Tim Hockin
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > >> For our use case this is a huge problem. We have people who access >> cgroup files in a fairly tight loops, polling for information. We >> have literally hundeds of jobs running on sub-second fr

Re: cgroup access daemon

2013-06-27 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@hockin.org): > Changing the subject, so as not to mix two discussions > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > >> > FWIW, the code is too embarassing yet to see daylight, but I'm playing > >> > with a very lowlevel cgroup manager which supports ne

cgroup access daemon

2013-06-27 Thread Tim Hockin
Changing the subject, so as not to mix two discussions On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > >> > FWIW, the code is too embarassing yet to see daylight, but I'm playing >> > with a very lowlevel cgroup manager which supports nesting itself. >> > Access in this POC is low-level ("