On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34:04AM +0530, anjana vk wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thankyou for your suggestions.
> I have made the modifications as suggested.
I already applied the version Li posted (as you the author, of course).
Thanks a lot!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
Hi All,
Thankyou for your suggestions.
I have made the modifications as suggested.
Please find the patch below.
>From fd85f093f912a160c0896ea2784dfbdd64f142ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anjana V Kumar
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:49:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Single thread break missing in cgrou
On 10/11, Li Zefan wrote:
>
> On 2013/10/10 0:54, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > And I am starting to think that this change should also fix the
> > while_each_thread() problems in this particular case.
Please see below,
> > In generak the code like
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > task = find_ge
On 2013/10/10 0:54, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> And I am starting to think that this change should also fix the
> while_each_thread() problems in this particular case.
>
> In generak the code like
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> task = find_get_task(...);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> rcu_r
And I am starting to think that this change should also fix the
while_each_thread() problems in this particular case.
In generak the code like
rcu_read_lock();
task = find_get_task(...);
rcu_read_unlock();
rcu_read_lock();
t = task;
do {
5 matches
Mail list logo