Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:29:16 +0200,
> Petko Manolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I wonder why the compiler decides to add ".section
> >.modinfo,"a",@progbits"
> >May be this is the thing which should be fixed.
>
> That is just gcc speak for section .modinfo is marked as a
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:29:16 +0200,
Petko Manolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wonder why the compiler decides to add ".section
>.modinfo,"a",@progbits"
>May be this is the thing which should be fixed.
That is just gcc speak for section .modinfo is marked as allocated,
type progbits. Read the
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> >Changing the declaration in linux/module.h to ".modinfo,"a""
> >fixed the problem, but i noticed that the author said that
> >"we want .modinfo to not be allocated"
>
> Historically that was the only way of preventing the .modinfo section
> from being included in modules
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:54:05 +0200,
Petko Manolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Warning: Ignoring changed section attributes for .modinfo"
>
>Changing the declaration in linux/module.h to ".modinfo,"a""
>fixed the problem, but i noticed that t
Hi there,
I noticed that when i changed to binutils 2.10.91 (Debian,woody)
i start to see messages like:
"Warning: Ignoring changed section attributes for .modinfo"
Chasing down the problem appeared that section modinfo is
declared for the first time as ".section .modin
5 matches
Mail list logo