On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 21:45 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 20:57 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> [etc...]
>
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 21:45 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 20:57 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> > > On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > [etc...]
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, that's a defect of some type.
> > >
> >
On Feb 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 20:57 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> [etc...]
>>>
>>> Yeah, that's a defect of some type.
>>
>> Also while I have your attention, here's another one:
>>
>> struct cfs_percp
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 20:57 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > [etc...]
> >
> > Yeah, that's a defect of some type.
>
> Also while I have your attention, here's another one:
>
> struct cfs_percpt_lock *
> cfs_percpt_lock_alloc(struct cfs_cpt_table *cp
On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> [etc...]
>
> Yeah, that's a defect of some type.
Also while I have your attention, here's another one:
struct cfs_percpt_lock *
cfs_percpt_lock_alloc(struct cfs_cpt_table *cptab)
{
struct cfs_percpt_lock *pcl;
spinlock_t
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 18:49 -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> As I am going over Lustre to clean up the code style, I noticed this bunch
> below.
>
> Those all are function definitions, though I guess it might have been
> foiled by
> return type on the previous line?
> Now s
6 matches
Mail list logo
