"Dunlap, Randy" wrote:
>
> > From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras?
>
> 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke
> several USB drivers, includ
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote:
From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras?
2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke
several USB drivers, including cpia USB.
Should be fixe
> From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras?
2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke
several USB drivers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras?
the last i remember using my webcam was toward the end of august.
it hasn't been working with test9 or test8 i don't think.
the device shows up just fine, the /proc/cpia/video0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras?
the last i remember using my webcam was toward the end of august.
it hasn't been working with test9 or test8 i don't think.
the device shows up just fine, the /proc/cpia/video0
From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras?
2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke
several USB drivers, including cpia USB.
Should
6 matches
Mail list logo