On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:26:24 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 28 2007 15:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow,
> >> about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq.
> >>
>
On Aug 28 2007 15:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow,
>> about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq.
>>
>> Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested rate but
>> assuming that the CPU
Hi Stephen :)
* Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:51:55 +0200 DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very
> > slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the
> > problem: c
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:51:55 +0200
DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow,
> about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq.
>
> Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the reque
Hi all :)
I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow,
about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq.
Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested rate but
assuming that the CPU is running at its default clock or something lik
5 matches
Mail list logo