ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
null expansion of name pattern "\1"
This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro expansion. Fix that by
getting rid of line break.
Similar fix was already done in
ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
null expansion of name pattern "\1"
This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro expansion. Fix that by
getting rid of line break.
Similar fix was already done in
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM Sam Protsenko
> wrote:
>>
>> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>>
>> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
&
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM Sam Protsenko
> wrote:
>>
>> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>>
>> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
&
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Sam Protsenko
> wrote:
> > ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
> >
> > ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Sam Protsenko
> wrote:
> > ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
> >
> > ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM Sam Protsenko
wrote:
>
> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>
> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
> null expansion of name pattern "\1"
>
> This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU(
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM Sam Protsenko
wrote:
>
> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>
> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
> null expansion of name pattern "\1"
>
> This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU(
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Sam Protsenko
wrote:
> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>
> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
> null expansion of name pattern "\1"
>
> This is the result of
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Sam Protsenko
wrote:
> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>
> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
> null expansion of name pattern "\1"
>
> This is the result of
ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
null expansion of name pattern "\1"
This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro exapansion. Fix that by
getting rid of line break.
Similar fix was already done in
ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
null expansion of name pattern "\1"
This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro exapansion. Fix that by
getting rid of line break.
Similar fix was already done in
Hi guys,
It's been a while since I sent this one. Can we please merge it if
there is no objections?
Thanks.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Sam Protsenko
wrote:
> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>
> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifie
Hi guys,
It's been a while since I sent this one. Can we please merge it if
there is no objections?
Thanks.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Sam Protsenko
wrote:
> ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
>
> ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifie
ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
null expansion of name pattern "\1"
This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro exapansion. Fix that by
getting rid of line break.
Similar fix was already done in
ctags indexing ("make tags" command) throws this warning:
ctags: Warning: include/linux/notifier.h:125:
null expansion of name pattern "\1"
This is the result of DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro exapansion. Fix that by
getting rid of line break.
Similar fix was already done in
ctags/cscope make tests only with needed binaries
Running tags and cscope make tests only if the 'ctags' and 'cscope'
binaries are installed, so we don't have false alarm test failures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Corey Ashford
Cc: David Ahern
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc
15:35:03 -0300
perf tests: Run ctags/cscope make tests only with needed binaries
Running tags and cscope make tests only if the 'ctags' and 'cscope'
binaries are installed, so we don't have false alarm test failures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com
Cc: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Cc
From: Jiri Olsa
Running tags and cscope make tests only if the 'ctags' and 'cscope'
binaries are installed, so we don't have false alarm test failures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Corey Ashford
Cc: David Ahern
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Namhyung Kim
Cc: Paul
Running tags and cscope make tests only if the 'ctags'
and 'cscope' binaries are installed, so we don't have
false alarm test failures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Corey Ashford
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Namhyung Kim
Cc: Paul Mackerras
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Arnaldo
Running tags and cscope make tests only if the 'ctags'
and 'cscope' binaries are installed, so we don't have
false alarm test failures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com
Cc: Corey Ashford cjash...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
From: Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com
Running tags and cscope make tests only if the 'ctags' and 'cscope'
binaries are installed, so we don't have false alarm test failures.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com
Cc: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Cc: Corey Ashford cjash...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc
1)Add magic for declarations of variables of popular kernel type
like spinlock_t, list_head, wait_queue_head_t and other.
2)Add a set of specially handled declaration extentions
like __attribute, __aligned and other.
3)Simplify pci_bus_* magic
Signed-off-by: Kirill V Tkhai
Cc: Michal Marek
1)Add magic for declarations of variables of popular kernel type
like spinlock_t, list_head, wait_queue_head_t and other.
2)Add a set of specially handled declaration extentions
like __attribute, __aligned and other.
3)Simplify pci_bus_* magic
Signed-off-by: Kirill V Tkhai tk...@yandex.ru
Cc:
On Mar 14, 2005 21:09 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I already applied your original patch (end of January) but only this week
> it hit Linus' tree.
> I think ctags users will just upgrade if their ctgs does not support
> --extra=+f.
I have ctags-5.4.2 (24 Jan 2003) and it has th
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:01:08PM -0500, John Kacur wrote:
> Exuberant ctags can tag file names too. I find this extremely useful
> when browsing kernel source, and so would like to share it with
> everyone. (You can now type ":tag oprof.c" for example, and jump to the
&g
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:01:08PM -0500, John Kacur wrote:
Exuberant ctags can tag file names too. I find this extremely useful
when browsing kernel source, and so would like to share it with
everyone. (You can now type :tag oprof.c for example, and jump to the
file with that name.)
I
On Mar 14, 2005 21:09 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
I already applied your original patch (end of January) but only this week
it hit Linus' tree.
I think ctags users will just upgrade if their ctgs does not support
--extra=+f.
I have ctags-5.4.2 (24 Jan 2003) and it has the --extra=+f support
Exuberant ctags can tag file names too. I find this extremely useful
when browsing kernel source, and so would like to share it with
everyone. (You can now type ":tag oprof.c" for example, and jump to the
file with that name.)
I previously sent a patch which naively just appended an &
Exuberant ctags can tag file names too. I find this extremely useful
when browsing kernel source, and so would like to share it with
everyone. (You can now type :tag oprof.c for example, and jump to the
file with that name.)
I previously sent a patch which naively just appended an --extra=+f
From: Mark Frazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:45 PM
> To: Khachaturov, Vassilii
> Cc: Linux Kernel
> Subject: Re: Makefile patch for cscope and saner Ctags
>
>
> Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [01/05/31 15:00]:
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:45 PM
To: Khachaturov, Vassilii
Cc: Linux Kernel
Subject: Re: Makefile patch for cscope and saner Ctags
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[01/05/31 15:00]:
Don't forget to bug RH package maintainer on that. Whatever
.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileThu May 31 16:29:38 2001
@@ -334,10 +334,41 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version | grep -i exuberant >/dev/null && echo "-I
__initdata,__exitdata,EXPORT_SYMBOL,EXPORT_SYMBOL_NO
> From: Mark Frazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
> > + cscope -b -k -I include
>
> The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
> [root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# cscope -b -k -I include
>
o sign up to maintain the ctags-ignore file though.
>
> How does the patch above fix anything? You're sorting so that
> include/linux/*.h comes before include/linux/{mtd,lockd,raid,...}/*.h,
> but I don't see how that can be an improvement, or how it addresses
> your original com
aned up
> in the clean target, while the cscope.files should probably should only be
> cleaned on rmproper or such.
>
> Vassilii
Backout the old patch and try this one.
--- Makefile.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileThu May 31 14:02:30 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,41 @@
#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
> output. It's against 2.4.5
>
> --- Makefile.old Mon May 28 22:44:01 2001
> +++ Makefile Wed May 30 17:50:01 2001
> @@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
>
> # Exuberant ctags works bette
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
> + cscope -b -I include
should become
+ cscope -b -k -I include
Also, I think you should separate cscope.files creation into a different
rule,
and make the cscope target depend on it and on the files in it. (Like the
stuff
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
+ cscope -b -I include
should become
+ cscope -b -k -I include
Also, I think you should separate cscope.files creation into a different
rule,
and make the cscope target depend on it and on the files in it. (Like the
stuff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
output. It's against 2.4.5
--- Makefile.old Mon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ Makefile Wed May 30 17:50:01 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
on rmproper or such.
Vassilii
Backout the old patch and try this one.
--- Makefile.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileThu May 31 14:02:30 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,41 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version | grep -i exuberant /dev/null
Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 13:56]:
You seem not to have read my response to your earlier mail proprosing
such a thing (for tags only, not cscope):
http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2001week21/1869.html
I did. I didn't want to sign up to maintain the ctags
From: Mark Frazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
+ cscope -b -k -I include
The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
[root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# cscope -b -k -I include
cscope: unknown
28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileThu May 31 16:29:38 2001
@@ -334,10 +334,41 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version | grep -i exuberant /dev/null echo -I
__initdata,__exitdata,EXPORT_SYMBOL,EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS`; \
+ CTAGSF=`ctags --version
The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
output. It's against 2.4.5
--- Makefile.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileWed May 30 17:50:01 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version
The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
output. It's against 2.4.5
--- Makefile.oldMon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ MakefileWed May 30 17:50:01 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
- CTAGSF=`ctags --version
Anyone have any good tips on getting tags to generate nicely?
I'm having some problems with some tags for macros and such being
declared in several places since ctags doesn't honour any CPP #if'ing.
I've currently got my Makefile doing this, which seems to give me some
sanity
Anyone have any good tips on getting tags to generate nicely?
I'm having some problems with some tags for macros and such being
declared in several places since ctags doesn't honour any CPP #if'ing.
I've currently got my Makefile doing this, which seems to give me some
sanity
hing is about...
Or, for a quick start, just do :cs
See also cscope on sourceforge.
HTH,
Vassilii
> -Original Message-
> From: Blesson Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 4:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ctags
>
>
>
> find -nam
find -name '*.[ch]' | ctag -L- &
echo "set tags-tags">>.vimrc
Hi
Thanks for the reply. To get the definition of the
functions above is enough. Now if there are more than one definition of the
same function how to get all the definitions
by
find -name '*.[ch]' | ctag -L-
echo set tags-tags.vimrc
Hi
Thanks for the reply. To get the definition of the
functions above is enough. Now if there are more than one definition of the
same function how to get all the definitions
by
...
Or, for a quick start, just do :cs
See also cscope on sourceforge.
HTH,
Vassilii
-Original Message-
From: Blesson Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 4:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ctags
find -name '*.[ch]' | ctag -L-
echo set tags-tags.vimrc
On the system here, ctags is called ctags-exuberant.
Against 2.4.1ac8
thanks
john
--- Makefile.oldFri Feb 9 14:24:29 2001
+++ MakefileFri Feb 9 14:06:08 2001
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip
OBJCOPY= $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy
OBJDUMP
On the system here, ctags is called ctags-exuberant.
Against 2.4.1ac8
thanks
john
--- Makefile.oldFri Feb 9 14:24:29 2001
+++ MakefileFri Feb 9 14:06:08 2001
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip
OBJCOPY= $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy
OBJDUMP
54 matches
Mail list logo
