On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:32:03 +0100 Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> "Mike Snitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24.x are obviously quite active for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What is [EMAIL PROTECTED] That sounds promising. The closest I
> could find is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:28:06AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would suggest stable - N-1 for most usages. 2.6.24.y is open, 2.6.23.y is
> > supposed to be good. The advantage when you proceed like this is that you
> > can jump from an older kern
"Mike Snitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24.x are obviously quite active for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is [EMAIL PROTECTED] That sounds promising. The closest I
could find is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would suggest stable - N-1 for most usages. 2.6.24.y is open, 2.6.23.y is
> supposed to be good. The advantage when you proceed like this is that you
> can jump from an older kernel to a more recent one which has already got its
> share of fixes and is
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:37:14PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Wagner Ferenc wrote:
>
> >which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
> >time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
> >Or more precisely: whi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:37:54PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 4:18 PM, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> > >
Wagner Ferenc wrote:
which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versions I can depend on for
a more or less critical server, those that
n mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> > >
> > >> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
> > >> time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
> > >> Or more precisely: which are t
On Feb 12, 2008 4:18 PM, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> >
> >> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any
On mar, 2008-02-12 at 22:18 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> >
> >> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
> >
and 2.6.22.y too
On 2/12/08, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> >
> >> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any
Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
>
>> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
>> time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
>>
Hi,
On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
> time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
> Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versi
Hi,
which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versions I can depend on for
a more or less critical server, those that have active security
s
14 matches
Mail list logo
