On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Eric Estabrooks wrote:
> A test probably needs to be added in the centaur_model section to test
> for the cyrixIII in disguise.
2.2.18pre, and 2.4.0test have contained this test for some time now.
However, I've heard no reports of it working or not due to no-one having
the ne
> The cyrixIII chips by via have the centaur vendor id which causes the
> identify_cpu call in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c to fail. It is probably
> reasonable for it to have the centaur id as via owns centaur as well. I
> just replaced the centaur_model call with the cyrix_model one, but I
> know
I am not a subscriber to this list, but I thought this was important
information (which you might already have).
The cyrixIII chips by via have the centaur vendor id which causes the
identify_cpu call in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c to fail. It is probably
reasonable for it to have the centaur id as
3 matches
Mail list logo
