Alexey Gladkov writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:50:21PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Alexey Gladkov writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:54:17AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> kernel test robot writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Greeting,
>> >> >
>> >> > FYI, we noticed a -82.7% reg
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:50:21PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alexey Gladkov writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:54:17AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> kernel test robot writes:
> >>
> >> > Greeting,
> >> >
> >> > FYI, we noticed a -82.7% regression of stress-ng.sigsegv.ops_pe
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:38 AM Alexey Gladkov
wrote:
>
> One of the reasons for this is that I rolled back the patch that changed
> the ucounts.count type to atomic_t. Now get_ucounts() is forced to use a
> spin_lock to increase the reference count.
Yeah, that definitely should be an atomic typ
Alexey Gladkov writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:54:17AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> kernel test robot writes:
>>
>> > Greeting,
>> >
>> > FYI, we noticed a -82.7% regression of stress-ng.sigsegv.ops_per_sec due
>> > to commit:
>> >
>> >
>> > commit: d28296d2484fa11e94dff65e93eb25802
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:54:17AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> kernel test robot writes:
>
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed a -82.7% regression of stress-ng.sigsegv.ops_per_sec due to
> > commit:
> >
> >
> > commit: d28296d2484fa11e94dff65e93eb25802a443d47 ("[PATCH v7 5/7]
> > Reimpl
kernel test robot writes:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -82.7% regression of stress-ng.sigsegv.ops_per_sec due to
> commit:
>
>
> commit: d28296d2484fa11e94dff65e93eb25802a443d47 ("[PATCH v7 5/7] Reimplement
> RLIMIT_SIGPENDING on top of ucounts")
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/
6 matches
Mail list logo