On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:23:22PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >Ack, I think 436e980e2ed5 ("kbuild: don't hardcode depmod path") is
> >stable material even if it doesn't fix a bug.
> >
> >Not only does the fix for that commit not make sens
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:23:22PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ack, I think 436e980e2ed5 ("kbuild: don't hardcode depmod path") is
stable material even if it doesn't fix a bug.
Not only does the fix for that commit not make sense without the
commit in the first place, but any environment that s
Ack, I think 436e980e2ed5 ("kbuild: don't hardcode depmod path") is
stable material even if it doesn't fix a bug.
Not only does the fix for that commit not make sense without the
commit in the first place, but any environment that sets depmod
somewhere else might well be an environment that still
Hi,
I was CCed on the "depmod: handle the case of /sbin/depmod without
/sbin in PATH" changes to linux-stable releases.
Do you mind also pushing...?
commit 436e980e2ed526832de822cbf13c317a458b78e1
kbuild: don't hardcode depmod path
That was the origin for the depmod follow-up.
Thanks.
Regards
4 matches
Mail list logo
