On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
>> > Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
>> > init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd
>> > have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
>> > would be a worse thing.
>>
>> The word "m
On Jan 19, 2014, at 7:27 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: don't use module_init in non-modular ... (was: Re: [PATCH]
m68k: don't use module_init in non-modular mvme16x/rtc.c code)] On
19/01/2014 (Sun 10:40) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
The word "module" has different m
[Re: don't use module_init in non-modular ... (was: Re: [PATCH] m68k: don't use
module_init in non-modular mvme16x/rtc.c code)] On 19/01/2014 (Sun 10:40) Geert
Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> > The r
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> The rtc.o is built for obj-y, i.e. always built in. It will
> never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall
> can be somewhat misleading.
>
> Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
> init.h
4 matches
Mail list logo