Re: down_killable implementations for every architecture

2008-02-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:23:52AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2008 00:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need > > down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every > > architecture, which we should probably fi

Re: down_killable implementations for every architecture

2008-01-28 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 00:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need > down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every > architecture, which we should probably fix at some point. It would be best to just change it now before doin

down_killable implementations for every architecture

2008-01-28 Thread Matthew Wilcox
As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every architecture, which we should probably fix at some point. On the plane ride down here, I did the necessary changes for each architecture: http://parisc-linux.org/~willy