On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:23:52AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 January 2008 00:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need
> > down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every
> > architecture, which we should probably
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:23:52AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 00:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need
down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every
architecture, which we should probably fix at
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 00:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need
> down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every
> architecture, which we should probably fix at some point.
It would be best to just change it now before
As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need
down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every
architecture, which we should probably fix at some point.
On the plane ride down here, I did the necessary changes for each
architecture:
As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need
down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every
architecture, which we should probably fix at some point.
On the plane ride down here, I did the necessary changes for each
architecture:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 00:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
As part of the TASK_KILLABLE changes, we're going to need
down_killable(). Unfortunately, semaphores are implemented for every
architecture, which we should probably fix at some point.
It would be best to just change it now before doing
6 matches
Mail list logo
