Re: drivers/video/output.c

2007-04-25 Thread Luming Yu
The user of output sysfs class is coming.. Please check out the acpi video_output patch I just sent to acpi mailing list. I can't post link here, just because It is not in archive of the ml yet.. On 4/18/07, Brown, Len <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Asides from git-bisect failing me again[1], what

Re: drivers/video/output.c

2007-04-18 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > git-bisect just fingered it as responsible for my "backlight doesn't turn on" > suspend/resume regression on the Thinkpad X60. I think it's lying. Actually I've seeing git bisect lying on me, too. I retried a few times (fortunately it didn't require reboot

RE: drivers/video/output.c

2007-04-17 Thread Brown, Len
>Asides from git-bisect failing me again[1], what gives with this file? it supports output switching, which didn't make it into 2.6.21 -- probably will be 2.6.22. -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majo

Re: drivers/video/output.c

2007-04-17 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
lying. > > Why? Because afaict, drivers/video/output.c is never compiled. > That commit adds the driver, but doesn't touch any Makefile, and I > don't see anything obvious in the follow-in commits that would 'enable' it. > > Asides from git-bisect failing me a

drivers/video/output.c

2007-04-17 Thread Dave Jones
commit 2dec3ba8d872aa3ffbcdb8f6f8a2c0bcd44e9910 puzzles me. git-bisect just fingered it as responsible for my "backlight doesn't turn on" suspend/resume regression on the Thinkpad X60. I think it's lying. Why? Because afaict, drivers/video/output.c is never compiled.