On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Paul Bolle wrote:
> [Detailed post, but please give it a quick scan.]
Please file the information in the bug you filed. Please attach dmesg
(again, on the bug) with drm.debug=14 and running your patch.
BR,
Jani.
>
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On
[Detailed post, but please give it a quick scan.]
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good
> > start.
>
> That would be between v4.7 and v4.8. (I gues
[Adding Matt]
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good
> start.
0) Why use a personal notebook when one can just post any half baked
idea to lkml?
1) I stumbled on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> That might take some time. Because bisecting always takes a long time
> and especially since hitting this WARNING sometimes takes over an hour.
> Anyhow, please prod me if I stay silent for too long.
For the record: I just had to power cycle t
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 17:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> In the mean time, please file a bug over at [1] so we don't lose
> track.
Done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98214
Paul Bolle
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>> Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good
>> start.
>
> That would be between v4.7 and v4.8. (I guess my report was ambiguous.)
>
> That might take some time. Because
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good
> start.
That would be between v4.7 and v4.8. (I guess my report was ambiguous.)
That might take some time. Because bisecting always takes a long time
and especially
On ke, 2016-10-12 at 11:56 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On a laptop that tracks the latest stable release (Ie, it now runs
> v4.8.1) I see this WARNING
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock)
>
> Full trace pasted below. I never saw this WARNING before v4.8. Since
> v4.8 I've had it in
On a laptop that tracks the latest stable release (Ie, it now runs
v4.8.1) I see this WARNING
WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock)
Full trace pasted below. I never saw this WARNING before v4.8. Since
v4.8 I've had it in all (four, actually) boots.
What am I expected to do about thi
9 matches
Mail list logo