On Tue 2013-05-07 17:30:52, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 01:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >It seems we made a mistake when creating dw_apb_timer_of.c:
> >picoxcell sched_clock had parts that were not related to
> >dw_apb_timer, yet we moved them to dw_apb_timer_of, and tried to
> >use them on
On 05/07/2013 01:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
It seems we made a mistake when creating dw_apb_timer_of.c:
picoxcell sched_clock had parts that were not related to
dw_apb_timer, yet we moved them to dw_apb_timer_of, and tried to
use them on socfpga.
This results in system where user/system time is
Hi!
> >>>So I guess it should go through the timekeeping tree...?
> >>I would prefer that, but we can also take it through arm-soc, it doesn't
> >>really matter.
> >I see no response from timekeeping people... so if you could take it,
> >that would be great.
>
> I don't think the original patch e
Hi!
> >>>So I guess it should go through the timekeeping tree...?
> >>I would prefer that, but we can also take it through arm-soc, it doesn't
> >>really matter.
> >I see no response from timekeeping people... so if you could take it,
> >that would be great.
>
> I don't think the original patch e
On 05/07/2013 06:57 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
So I guess it should go through the timekeeping tree...?
I would prefer that, but we can also take it through arm-soc, it doesn't
really matter.
I see no response from timekeeping people... so if you could take it,
that would be great.
I don't think
On Mon 2013-05-06 23:24:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2013-05-06 15:45:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based
Hi Pavel,
Apologies for the delay, but this looks good to me.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:43:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> It seems we made a mistake when creating dw_apb_timer_of.c:
> picoxcell sched_clock had parts that were not related to
> dw_apb_timer, yet we moved them to dw_apb_timer_of
On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2013-05-06 15:45:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on
> > > Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him,
On Mon 2013-05-06 15:45:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on
> > Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him, too.
> >
> > It brings two platforms closer together, a
On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on
> Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him, too.
>
> It brings two platforms closer together, and makes time actually work
> on socfpga. It would be good to get
Hi!
Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on
Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him, too.
It brings two platforms closer together, and makes time actually work
on socfpga. It would be good to get it applied.
Thanks,
It seems we made a mistake when creating dw_apb_timer_of.c:
picoxcell sched_clock had parts that were not related to
dw_apb_timer, yet we moved them to dw_apb_timer_of, and tried to
use them on socfpga.
This results in system where user/system time is not measured
properly, as demonstrated by
Hi!
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:14:34PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> > index 70b441a..22759f5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> > @@ -84,11 +84,39
Hi Pavel,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:14:34PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> index 70b441a..22759f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
> @@ -84,11 +84,39 @@ stat
It seems we made a mistake when creating dw_apb_timer_of.c:
picoxcell sched_clock parts were not related to dw_apb_timer, yet
we moved them to dw_apb_timer_of, and tried to use them on socfpga.
This results in system where user/system time is not measured properly,
as demonstrated by
15 matches
Mail list logo
