Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-17 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
"Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PERR+ set... not good - this certainly will cause major issues Unfortunately some devices assert PERR without a good reason, and it may do no special harm. Should be handled and cleared, probably. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: sen

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-17 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am able to analyze the primary bus while the using the card in the > secondary and I see a very interesting thing on lockup - the primary > side appears to be stuck on a read access to the memory mapped control > regs of the LAN chip (82559) in wh

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-17 Thread William Montgomery
Kok, Auke wrote: 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER Hub interface to PCI Bridge (rev 82) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fa

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-17 Thread Kok, Auke
William Montgomery wrote: Krzysztof Halasa wrote: William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be han

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-17 Thread William Montgomery
Krzysztof Halasa wrote: William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be handled correctly. Anything I

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-14 Thread William Montgomery
Krzysztof Halasa wrote: William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be handled correctly. Anything I

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-14 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after > the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a > couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be handled > correctly. Anything I should be looking for

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-14 Thread William Montgomery
Krzysztof Halasa wrote: William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable and occurs on 2 o

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-14 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
William Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition > that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using > a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable > and occurs on 2 out of 3 computers. > >

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-13 Thread William Montgomery
Kok, Auke wrote: William Montgomery wrote: Thanks for responding. I am very interested to find the source of this problem. Kok, Auke wrote: William Montgomery wrote: In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.1

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-13 Thread Kok, Auke
William Montgomery wrote: Thanks for responding. I am very interested to find the source of this problem. Kok, Auke wrote: William Montgomery wrote: In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using a 4 por

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-13 Thread William Montgomery
Thanks for responding. I am very interested to find the source of this problem. Kok, Auke wrote: William Montgomery wrote: In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card

Re: e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-13 Thread Kok, Auke
William Montgomery wrote: In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable and occurs on 2 out of 3 computers. Further testing has revealed th

e100 PCI bridge problem

2007-07-13 Thread William Montgomery
In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable and occurs on 2 out of 3 computers. Further testing has revealed that the lockup can be preve