Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
> >
> > I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
> >
> > ===
> > static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
> >
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
>
> I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
>
> ===
> static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
> size_t count, loff_t
Okay, okay, I didn't really make my point persuasively enough.
The file linux/drivers/char/mem.c contains this:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
size_t count, loff_t
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:53:04AM +1030, Alan Kennington wrote:
I still think that write_null() should be rewritten as:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
Okay, okay, I didn't really make my point persuasively enough.
The file linux/drivers/char/mem.c contains this:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
It seems to me that this code in linux/drivers/char/mem.c
is a bug:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
return count;
}
It seems to me that this code in linux/drivers/char/mem.c
is a bug:
===
static ssize_t write_null(struct file * file, const char * buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
return count;
}
8 matches
Mail list logo
