Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread Alan Cox
> want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the > any of the emu10k1 I dont think its the emu10k1 itself. Nor does it seem to be the init function not being called (folks report seeing the init messages in both cases). I need to trace the init order some time - To

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread Juri Haberland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > All reports I've seen mention that the driver works fine if compiled as a > module. You may > want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the > any of the emu10k1 > source files (which you diff'ed), unfortunately I haven't had much >

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread rui . sousa
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/12/00 08:43 Subject: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread rui . sousa
] 19/12/00 08:43 Subject: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18 Please respond to Ari

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread Juri Haberland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All reports I've seen mention that the driver works fine if compiled as a module. You may want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the any of the emu10k1 source files (which you diff'ed), unfortunately I haven't had much time/means to

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread Alan Cox
want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the any of the emu10k1 I dont think its the emu10k1 itself. Nor does it seem to be the init function not being called (folks report seeing the init messages in both cases). I need to trace the init order some time - To

emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-18 Thread Ari Heitner
Alan/Rui, just built 2.2.18 (on a box that's been running 2.2.14 for a very very long time, and loading an emu10k1 module from opensource.creative.com or wherever). was pleased to note that emu10k1 finally made it in. Compiled and built. Dmesg indicated that things were detecting nicely, but

emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-18 Thread Ari Heitner
Alan/Rui, just built 2.2.18 (on a box that's been running 2.2.14 for a very very long time, and loading an emu10k1 module from opensource.creative.com or wherever). was pleased to note that emu10k1 finally made it in. Compiled and built. Dmesg indicated that things were detecting nicely, but

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-17 Thread Simon Lodal
> - Do you have emu10k1 compiled in, or as a module? > - Does your SBLive appear to have been detected? (Check 'dmesg') > - If emu10k1 is a module, is the module loaded? Does it seem to detect > your SBLive when loaded? (Again check 'dmesg') On my machine emu10k1 works as a module, but not

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-17 Thread Simon Lodal
- Do you have emu10k1 compiled in, or as a module? - Does your SBLive appear to have been detected? (Check 'dmesg') - If emu10k1 is a module, is the module loaded? Does it seem to detect your SBLive when loaded? (Again check 'dmesg') On my machine emu10k1 works as a module, but not at

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-16 Thread kees
Hi Peter, In _my_ case I compiled the EMU10K straight into the kernel. dmesg shows it's found. The funny thing is that a second machine with an es1371 board alos fails with 2.2.18. 2.2.17 is ok. Taking that .config and 'make oldconfig' produces a kernel that doesnt allow the emu10k to work. (as

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dima Brodsky] > cat x > /dev/dsp > bash: /dev/dsp: No such device > > But an ls -l shows: > > crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 3 Dec 15 21:25 dsp > crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 19 Dec 15 21:25 dsp1 'ls -l' is useless, here. Sure the device files exist, but bash

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-16 Thread kees
Hi, I have reported the same experience some days ago. I have a second machine with a es1371 this also fails. Kees On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Dima Brodsky wrote: > Hi, > > The sound (emu10k1) seems to be broken under 2.2.18. > If I do: > > cat x > /dev/dsp > > I get: > > bash:

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-16 Thread kees
Hi, I have reported the same experience some days ago. I have a second machine with a es1371 this also fails. Kees On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Dima Brodsky wrote: Hi, The sound (emu10k1) seems to be broken under 2.2.18. If I do: cat x /dev/dsp I get: bash: /dev/dsp: No

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Dima Brodsky] cat x /dev/dsp bash: /dev/dsp: No such device But an ls -l shows: crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 3 Dec 15 21:25 dsp crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 19 Dec 15 21:25 dsp1 'ls -l' is useless, here. Sure the device files exist, but bash is

Re: Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-16 Thread kees
Hi Peter, In _my_ case I compiled the EMU10K straight into the kernel. dmesg shows it's found. The funny thing is that a second machine with an es1371 board alos fails with 2.2.18. 2.2.17 is ok. Taking that .config and 'make oldconfig' produces a kernel that doesnt allow the emu10k to work. (as

Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Dima Brodsky
Hi, The sound (emu10k1) seems to be broken under 2.2.18. If I do: cat x > /dev/dsp I get: bash: /dev/dsp: No such device But an ls -l shows: crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 3 Dec 15 21:25 dsp crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 19 Dec 15 21:25 dsp1 Same thing

Sound (emu10k1) broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Dima Brodsky
Hi, The sound (emu10k1) seems to be broken under 2.2.18. If I do: cat x /dev/dsp I get: bash: /dev/dsp: No such device But an ls -l shows: crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 3 Dec 15 21:25 dsp crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 19 Dec 15 21:25 dsp1 Same thing with