On Friday 02 February 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I think it would be reasonable to use the NR_epoll* names first, and to
> declare NR_sys_epoll* aliases which will point to NR_epoll*. You would
> then add a comment with the date of the change, stating that you keep
> them just in case there are s
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:19:35AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 02 February 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It might be to late to fix this - we risk breaking userspace which worked
> > around it.
>
> we'd be breaking userspace API, but not ABI ... and the largest consumers out
> there
On Friday 02 February 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It might be to late to fix this - we risk breaking userspace which worked
> around it.
we'd be breaking userspace API, but not ABI ... and the largest consumers out
there (glibc/uclibc) have not been accounting for this, so we wouldnt be
breakin
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:20:45 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the alpha linux port differs from all others when it comes to the epoll
> functions in that it uses '__NR_sys_epoll_XXX' instead of '__NR_epoll_XXX' in
> the asm/unistd.h header ... the trouble with this is that glibc
the alpha linux port differs from all others when it comes to the epoll
functions in that it uses '__NR_sys_epoll_XXX' instead of '__NR_epoll_XXX' in
the asm/unistd.h header ... the trouble with this is that glibc maps the
function name directly to an __NR_ define, so when it maps
like 'epoll_c
5 matches
Mail list logo
