Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels

2007-10-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Dave" == Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dave> Many of these that I've seen have turned out to be a hardware > Dave> problem. Try running memtest86+ on that machine for a while. > Dave> It doesn't catch all problems,

Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels

2007-10-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:03:02AM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > > "Dave" == Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dave> Many of these that I've seen have turned out to be a hardware > Dave> problem. Try running memtest86+ on that machine for a while. > Dave> It doe

Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels

2007-10-16 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
> "Dave" == Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dave> Many of these that I've seen have turned out to be a hardware Dave> problem. Try running memtest86+ on that machine for a while. Dave> It doesn't catch all problems, but it will highlight more Dave> common memory

Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels

2007-10-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:17:32PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > Hello, > > We have often the following error from the kernel: > > sshd[1551] trap invalid opcode rip:2aeacc0677a0 rsp:7fffe0c7e688 error:0 > Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) >page pfn = 7f7a8 >page-

error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels

2007-10-16 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hello, We have often the following error from the kernel: sshd[1551] trap invalid opcode rip:2aeacc0677a0 rsp:7fffe0c7e688 error:0 Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) page pfn = 7f7a8 page->flags = 4001002c page->count = 1 page->mapping = 810056170550 vma->v