On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:12:35PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:36 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 7:53 PM Justin Stitt wrote:
> > > `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated
o this, let's use `strscpy` as it guarantees
> > NUL-terminated on the destination buffer preventing potential buffer
> > overreads [2].
> >
> > This exact invocation was changed from `strcpy` to `strncpy` in commit
> > 7879b1d94badb ("um,ethertap: use strncpy") back in 20
on the destination buffer preventing potential buffer
> overreads [2].
>
> This exact invocation was changed from `strcpy` to `strncpy` in commit
> 7879b1d94badb ("um,ethertap: use strncpy") back in 2015. Let's continue
> hardening our `str*cpy` apis and use the newer and safer
on the destination buffer preventing potential buffer
overreads [2].
This exact invocation was changed from `strcpy` to `strncpy` in commit
7879b1d94badb ("um,ethertap: use strncpy") back in 2015. Let's continue
hardening our `str*cpy` apis and use the newer and safer `strscpy`!
Link:
www.kern
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Alan wrote:
> I can't prove the case pointed out in
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82341
> is correct so let us play safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
> ---
> arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ethertap_user.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
I can't prove the case pointed out in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82341
is correct so let us play safe.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
---
arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ethertap_user.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
I can't prove the case pointed out in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82341
is correct so let us play safe.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ethertap_user.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Alan gno...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
I can't prove the case pointed out in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82341
is correct so let us play safe.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ethertap_user.c |2
Hi!
According /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ethertap.txt I've tried
to use ethertap for my experimental user space TCP/IP implementation
testing. I'm using kernel 2.2.19 (UP).
I load ethertap kernel module and configure it with ifconfig. Nice,
ping works, ifconfig show tap0. /dev
Hi!
According /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ethertap.txt I've tried
to use ethertap for my experimental user space TCP/IP implementation
testing. I'm using kernel 2.2.19 (UP).
I load ethertap kernel module and configure it with ifconfig. Nice,
ping works, ifconfig show tap0. /dev
Hi,
I am sorry the might be of the list's normal content.
My colleague will be on leave in may this year in states and wish to attend any I.T
related conference during that period.
Can you please send any info. if you are aware of any for that period.
Thanks,
Jones
Find the best deals on
Hi,
I am sorry the might be of the list's normal content.
My colleague will be on leave in may this year in states and wish to attend any I.T
related conference during that period.
Can you please send any info. if you are aware of any for that period.
Thanks,
Jones
Find the best deals on
I have a quick question regarding the ethertap device and routing. We're seeing
the contents of the packet coming up through the ethertap device just fine, but
the originating address seems to be overwritten with the ethertap device's
address.
Am I missing something obvious here? I'm positive
I have a quick question regarding the ethertap device and routing. We're seeing
the contents of the packet coming up through the ethertap device just fine, but
the originating address seems to be overwritten with the ethertap device's
address.
Am I missing something obvious here? I'm positive
14 matches
Mail list logo
