Re: ext3fs 0.0.5d and reiserfs 3.5.2x mutually exclusive

2001-01-08 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:50:44PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > I just tried to patch ext3fs 0.0.5d on top of a 2.2.18 that already had > reiserfs 3.5.28 and failed, there are overlapping patches in fs/buffer.c > that I cannot resolve for lack of knowledge how buffer.c and journalling > ar

Re: ext3fs 0.0.5d and reiserfs 3.5.2x mutually exclusive

2001-01-06 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Chris Mason wrote: > I keep saying I'm going to do this, and keep dropping it. Your changes for > reiserfs_journal_release and reiserfs_buffer_journaled are going into my > tree right now. > > Are there any others? Yes, in buffer.c at least. I will publish a list later tod

ext3fs 0.0.5d and reiserfs 3.5.2x mutually exclusive

2001-01-04 Thread Matthias Andree
I just tried to patch ext3fs 0.0.5d on top of a 2.2.18 that already had reiserfs 3.5.28 and failed, there are overlapping patches in fs/buffer.c that I cannot resolve for lack of knowledge how buffer.c and journalling are supposed to fit together. I reported ext3fs and reiserfs incompatibilities