Re: f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()")

On Fri, 3 May 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:19:21PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 3 May 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:53:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > Hello, Alan, > > > > > > > > Just following up on the -rcu com

Re: f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()")

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:19:21PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:53:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello, Alan, > > > > > > Just following up on the -rcu commit below. I believe that it needs > > > some adjustment

Re: f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()")

On Fri, 3 May 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:53:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Hello, Alan, > > > > Just following up on the -rcu commit below. I believe that it needs > > some adjustment given Peter Zijlstra's addition of "memory" to the x86 > > non-value-retu

Re: f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()")

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:53:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello, Alan, > > Just following up on the -rcu commit below. I believe that it needs > some adjustment given Peter Zijlstra's addition of "memory" to the x86 > non-value-returning atomics, but thought I should double-check. Righ

f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()")

Hello, Alan, Just following up on the -rcu commit below. I believe that it needs some adjustment given Peter Zijlstra's addition of "memory" to the x86 non-value-returning atomics, but thought I should double-check. Thanx, Paul ---