> Petr Vandrovec writes:
> On 12 Sep 00 at 19:02, Matti Aarnio wrote:
>> ReiserFS: Propably works
>> EXT2: works
>> Coda: Not (local cache issues, protocol is ok.)
>> UFS: works (although not complete vs. O_LARGEFILE flag use.)
>> NFSv2:protocol is limited to 2G-1
>> NFSv3:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:09:03PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 12 Sep 00 at 19:02, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > ReiserFS: Propably works
> > EXT2: works
> > Coda: Not (local cache issues, protocol is ok.)
> > UFS: works (although not complete vs. O_LARGEFILE flag use.
On 12 Sep 00 at 19:02, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> ReiserFS: Propably works
> EXT2: works
> Coda: Not (local cache issues, protocol is ok.)
> UFS: works (although not complete vs. O_LARGEFILE flag use.)
> NFSv2:protocol is limited to 2G-1
> NFSv3:protocol is
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:15:52PM +0200, Arnaud Installe wrote:
> First of all, thanks to all of you for your responses. :-) I was under
> the impression 2.4 still didn't have large file support, as I seem to
> recall ssize_t still was 32 bits.
The LFS specification defined loff_t for
> Arnaud Installe writes:
> First of all, thanks to all of you for your responses. :-) I was under
> the impression 2.4 still didn't have large file support, as I seem to
> recall ssize_t still was 32 bits.
off64_t is the type you want to look at.
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:25:02PM +
First of all, thanks to all of you for your responses. :-) I was under
the impression 2.4 still didn't have large file support, as I seem to
recall ssize_t still was 32 bits.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Arnaud Installe writes:
>
> > Hello,
> > I ne
> Arnaud Installe writes:
> Hello,
> I need support for files larger than 2GB. What's the status for that ?
> AFAIK neither 2.2 nor 2.4-test support that out of the box. Can anyone
> point me to a good link for patches ? Apart from the kernel, does
> anything else need changes for l
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I need support for files larger than 2GB. What's the status for that ?
>
> 2.2 + patches or 2.4 test and glibc 2.1.9x
And make sure the utilities you want to work with those 2GB+ files were
compiled with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 (che
> I need support for files larger than 2GB. What's the status for that ?
2.2 + patches or 2.4 test and glibc 2.1.9x
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hello,
I need support for files larger than 2GB. What's the status for that ?
AFAIK neither 2.2 nor 2.4-test support that out of the box. Can anyone
point me to a good link for patches ? Apart from the kernel, does
anything else need changes for large file support ?
Thanks,
10 matches
Mail list logo
