Nick Piggin wrote:
On Thursday 01 November 2007 12:56, bc Wong (chimwong) wrote:
Hi,
With 2.6.16 x86_64 on a 4 core machine, I noticed
that the filp usage (according to /proc/slabinfo)
shoots up and keeps on increasing sharply when one
of the CPUs is (1) locked up, or (2) very busy
doing a lot
Nick Piggin wrote:
On Thursday 01 November 2007 12:56, bc Wong (chimwong) wrote:
Hi,
With 2.6.16 x86_64 on a 4 core machine, I noticed
that the filp usage (according to /proc/slabinfo)
shoots up and keeps on increasing sharply when one
of the CPUs is (1) locked up, or (2) very busy
doing a lot
On Thursday 01 November 2007 12:56, bc Wong (chimwong) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With 2.6.16 x86_64 on a 4 core machine, I noticed
> that the filp usage (according to /proc/slabinfo)
> shoots up and keeps on increasing sharply when one
> of the CPUs is (1) locked up, or (2) very busy
> doing a lot of
Hi,
With 2.6.16 x86_64 on a 4 core machine, I noticed
that the filp usage (according to /proc/slabinfo)
shoots up and keeps on increasing sharply when one
of the CPUs is (1) locked up, or (2) very busy
doing a lot of printk()'s with KERN_EMERG.
In the case of (1), it's permanent until it runs
Hi,
With 2.6.16 x86_64 on a 4 core machine, I noticed
that the filp usage (according to /proc/slabinfo)
shoots up and keeps on increasing sharply when one
of the CPUs is (1) locked up, or (2) very busy
doing a lot of printk()'s with KERN_EMERG.
In the case of (1), it's permanent until it runs
On Thursday 01 November 2007 12:56, bc Wong (chimwong) wrote:
Hi,
With 2.6.16 x86_64 on a 4 core machine, I noticed
that the filp usage (according to /proc/slabinfo)
shoots up and keeps on increasing sharply when one
of the CPUs is (1) locked up, or (2) very busy
doing a lot of printk()'s
6 matches
Mail list logo
