Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread David Miller
From: Theodore Ts'o Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:40:58 -0500 > Would it be possible to set up a new mailing list on vger.kernel.org, > linux-cover...@vger.kernel.org? Done. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.o

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:41:12PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:31:51PM +, ty...@mit.edu wrote: > > I'm paying attention to Linux kernel coverity reports (as well as > > working on my goal to drive the number of e2fsprogs coverity reports > > to zero :-), so feel free to

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:31:51PM +, ty...@mit.edu wrote: > I'm paying attention to Linux kernel coverity reports (as well as > working on my goal to drive the number of e2fsprogs coverity reports > to zero :-), so feel free to CC me on any reports. Okay, 3 people sounds like "we need a maili

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread tytso
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:05:54PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > I'd be up for it. It's why I CC'd you, I figured if I'd missed the > report it would have likely have come from you. :) Perhaps just start > by CCing each other, and if others want to get in on the fun too, move > to a list then? I'm

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:03:47PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > I wonder if it's worth getting a cover...@vger.kernel.org list set up for > cc'ing stuff like this to reduce dupe reports (though this is the first I > recall in a while), and for review of patches etc before forwarding them on > to thei

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:54:53PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:50:37PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:43:08PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This seems like a legit problem detected by Coverity. Looks like a > > break is >

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:50:37PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:43:08PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This seems like a legit problem detected by Coverity. Looks like a break is > > missing? > > yup, reported this morning. > (Also note that I changed the st

Re: flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:43:08PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > This seems like a legit problem detected by Coverity. Looks like a break is > missing? yup, reported this morning. (Also note that I changed the state in coverity once Patrick confirmed it) Dave -- To unsubscribe

flaw in "nf_tables: add reject module for NFPROTO_INET"

2014-02-12 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, This seems like a legit problem detected by Coverity. Looks like a break is missing? -Kees On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:34:33PM -0800, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Linux found with > Coverity Scan. > > Defect(s)